Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
danohu: (Default)
[personal profile] danohu
Tube strikes make the unions pretty unpopular.

What if the unions instead had a (publicised) day of turning a blind eye to fare-dodgers? That would still cost their employers plenty of money, but would presumably fill the public with enthusiasm rather than hatred.

The main problem would be that while there's plenty of legal protection for strikes, there's much less for employees refusing to perform some part of their job. Doubly so since London Underground undoubtedly already has disciplinary procedures in place for staff who help fare-dodgers. Also I'd imagine many tube employees not being too keen on people who don't pay.

Still, it'd be a nice change from strikes. Have any transport unions tried this kind of thing, elsewhere in the world? What was the result?

Date: 2011-01-03 11:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] friend-of-tofu.livejournal.com
What if the unions instead had a (publicised) day of turning a blind eye to fare-dodgers? That would still cost their employers plenty of money, but would presumably fill the public with enthusiasm rather than hatred.

No, it'd make them even more hated, since the regular passengers would still have paid their travelcard fares. This is a really, really bad idea, sorry, even without considering any moral implications.

Date: 2011-01-03 11:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oedipamaas49.livejournal.com
OK, maybe enthusiasm is pushing it a bit.

But you'd really be more annoyed by other people travelling free, than by being totally unable to use public transport? Really?

Date: 2011-01-03 12:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] friend-of-tofu.livejournal.com
Me personally, I'm not the problem; I'm pro-union strike or no. But can you imagine how this would play in public? Come *on*. At least with strikes, everyone's in it together. Rewarding crime is another matter entirely not to mention blatantly unfair. If there's one thing which works the English up, it's the appearance of unfairness.

I think you're being extremely unrealistic here.

Date: 2011-01-03 11:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] delkaetre-ni.livejournal.com
I wouldn't be all that bothered about one or two days of fare-strike each month, and I fork out £116/month for my Zone 1-3 Travelcard (possibly more now- I think prices have gone up in the new year). But it very much would depend on how well the fare-strike was announced, and how often the strikes are held.

One day's strike, or even two or three in a month isn't too bad - but if there was a two-week solid fare-strike, that /would/ stir up resentment, even in me. I can't afford to waste the best part of £60, and quite a lot of commuters are in a similar low-wage situation. I have a lot of sympathy, but I don't have a lot of money, and someone else wasting that much of it wouldn't be taken well.

Occasional and short fare-strikes would have to be well planned, well announced, and carefully targeted to win sympathy, win support, and avoid building up too much resentment. Keep the novelty value of it, rather than making travelcard owners feel cheated of their money.

(I'm assuming, here, that they'll open all barriers and just leave them like that, the way some stations do anyway on weekends and during peak hours. Having to jump the barriers would just be irritating - and very difficult for anyone disabled or with limited mobility.)

January 2019

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 02:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios